闽台青年“包饺子”大赛 新春围炉守岁过小年******
(新春见闻)闽台青年“包饺子”大赛 新春围炉守岁过小年
中新网福州1月26日电 (郑江洛)26日，腊月二十四，正值南方小年，在华优汇创闽台家园台湾青年就业创业基地，人声鼎沸，欢乐滚滚，每年岁末，闽台家园都会举办“爱在家园”留榕台青新春围炉守岁日活动。
写春联、包饺子……记者在现场看到，四五十名闽台青年分为吉、福、旺、春、发五队，以游戏竞赛的方式正如火如荼地进行五福临门包饺子大赛。
闽台青年正在写春联。 郑江洛 摄闽台家园台湾青年创新创业基地执行总监李宛芯介绍说，每队不仅要完成160个饺子及写6副春联外，还要拍出各队特色写真，考验各队的组织分工及执行能力。“留榕的台湾青年以及本地青年，一起包饺子有过年的气氛，寓意着融合，很好的互动，共建闽台家园，虎年有一个新的开始。”
“今年是我第三年留在福州过年，今年很特别，有这么多的小伙伴一起围炉过年。”台青简以信正和同组组员们忙着做饺子馅。他表示，饺子一般是北方人过节喜爱的食物，这对于南方人而言，是一个比较“稀奇好玩”的体验，这也是他包饺子的“首秀”。今年能和这么多闽台青年一起包饺子、写春联，让他感觉“很温暖。”
简以信在福州落地已有八年，目前，他和几名台青共同在福建创业，过去一年，做了一些两岸文创相关的设计，并开展了多场两岸交流的活动，他表示，“希望未来能够继续加深两岸之间的融合交流。”
“第一次在福州写春联，过小年。”台青柳钟伟刚到福州两个月，他说，虽然不能和台湾的家人一起过年，但能和这么多台湾小伙伴一起过年，感到很特别。他看中大陆市场他，“尤其是宠物这个产业的发展性”，预计接下来在福州开一家宠物美容店。
今年是台籍钢琴教师王国全第一次在福州过年，他同样很看好大陆的文化教育市场，他在福州落地已有7、8年的时间，“觉得当初的选择是对的。”
王国全上个月刚和太太在福州成立了自己的琴行，工作室目前已有一两百学生。他告诉记者，今天和这么多台湾人在这里相聚，挺热闹的，很不一样的感觉，非常开心。“希望新的一年，能把这个项目做得越来越精致，成果越来越好。”
参与活动的闽台青年大合影。 郑江洛 摄在闽台家园平台负责运营的台青萧国佑接受记者采访时表示，借由这次活动，团队协作能增加大家的凝聚力和向心力，增加彼此的感情，让大家凝聚起来，更加熟识，事业上互相促进。他希望，疫情早日过去，两岸间能够早日更好互通，更多的台胞来到大陆这边发展。
最近萧国佑还忙着置办新家具、家电，准备入住福州市晋安区台湾社区一号楼公寓，作为首批45户台胞租户之一，他对新生活充满了期待，这比他之前租房节约八九百元。“能够减轻我们来大陆的生活压力，把有限的时间和资金，投入事业当中。”(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
